As reported by my partner, Ron Moscona, according to the recent decision of the Court of Justice of the European
Union (“ECJ”) in SAS
Institute Inc. (“SAS Institute”) v World Programming Ltd (“WPL”),
the defendant did not infringe the claimant’s copyright by effectively reverse
engineering the SAS software and writing a new program closely emulating the
functionality of the SAS software. The decision of the ECJ lays down an
important statement of principles in relation to the extent to which copyright
protects computer programs (but not their functionality) under European Union
law, although in respect of some practical aspects of the matter the Court’s
decision fails to provide useful guidance.
Check out Ron's full article on this case by clicking here.
Thanks, Ron!
The Point of Novelty will explore trends, events and policies that impact intellectual property rights. The views and opinions expressed in this blog are solely those of the author, and are not necessarily those of Andrews Kurth LLP. The information provided in this blog is for educational purposes only and are not conveying legal advice or services. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. No attorney-client relationship is established by activity on this blog.